Iran Navy sends clear message to adversaries with display of cutting-edge weapons

By Mohammad Molaei

Earlier this week, the Islamic Republic of Iran Navy held a significant missile exercise, codenamed “Sustainable Power 1404,” in the northern Indian Ocean and the Sea of Oman.

Launched with the operational code “Ya Mohammad Rasool Allah (PBUH),” the two-day maneuver was a meticulous display of Iran’s evolving naval and missile capabilities, especially in the wake of tensions fueled by the recent 12-day Israeli-American war against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

I see it not merely as a routine drill but as a calculated projection of military power, a demonstration of technological maturity, and a strategic signal to both regional adversaries and global powers.

The drills, held near Iran’s southeastern ports of Konarak and Chabahar, showcased a sophisticated array of domestically produced weaponry, including missiles and drones, and revealed tactical innovations that could pose significant challenges to adversaries.

It involved a broad spectrum of Iran’s naval assets, integrating surface and subsurface vessels, aviation units, and shore-based missile batteries. Participating platforms included missile corvettes like the Genaweh, destroyers such as the Sabalan, and a range of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and helicopters.

The inclusion of electronic warfare (EW) units underscored Iran’s growing emphasis on disrupting enemy communications and radar systems, a critical component of modern naval warfare.

The drill’s geographical scope, spanning the northern Indian Ocean, positioned it in a strategically vital region where maritime trade routes converge, and where Iran has long sought to assert its influence.

The choice of the venue was deliberate, signaling Iran’s ability to project power far beyond its coastal waters and into a theater of global geopolitical significance.

The missile systems deployed during “Sustainable Power 1404” were entirely indigenous, reflecting Iran’s self-reliance in defense technology. The drills prominently featured three types of anti-ship cruise missiles: the Nasir, Qadir, and Qader.

The Nasir, a short-range, radar-evading missile, is designed for rapid deployment against naval targets, offering high maneuverability and precision. Its compact design allows it to be launched from smaller vessels, making it a versatile weapon for asymmetric warfare.

The Qadir, a long-range anti-ship cruise missile, extends Iran’s strike capability to targets hundreds of kilometers away, with stealth features that complicate detection by enemy radar systems.

The Qader, a medium-range missile, balances range and payload, incorporating advanced guidance systems to ensure pinpoint accuracy against moving targets.

Together, these missiles form a layered anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) strategy, enabling Iran to target enemy vessels at varying distances while minimizing exposure to counterattacks.

A particularly noteworthy aspect of the drills was the coordinated use of these missiles in a simultaneous strike scenario. The exercise culminated in the destruction of a designated surface target using a synchronized salvo of Nasir, Qadir, and Qader missiles, alongside a kamikaze-style drone, the Bavar-5.

This UAV, with a reported operational range of 400 kilometers, demonstrated its ability to locate and destroy both surface and coastal targets with high precision.

The integration of missiles and drones in a single strike package marks a significant development, as it showcases Iran’s ability to conduct complex, multi-vector attacks.

Such coordination requires advanced command-and-control systems, real-time data sharing, and precise targeting algorithms, capabilities that Iran has evidently refined.

For an adversary, this presents a daunting challenge: defending against a barrage of stealthy missiles and drones approaching from multiple directions simultaneously.

The strategic significance of “Sustainable Power 1404” cannot be overstated. Coming in the wake of the 12-day imposed war, it served as a bold statement of resilience and readiness. It was the first major military maneuver following the war, and its timing suggests a deliberate effort to reassert Iran’s deterrence posture.

By conducting the drills in the Indian Ocean, Iran signaled its intent to dominate key maritime chokepoints, particularly the Strait of Hormuz and adjacent waters, through which a significant portion of global oil trade flows.

It demonstrated Iran’s capacity to disrupt these routes if provoked, a message aimed at both regional rivals and extra-regional powers with a naval presence in the area.

Furthermore, the successful execution of the drills under realistic combat conditions highlighted Iran’s operational readiness and its ability to integrate diverse platforms into a cohesive fighting force.

One of the most striking elements of the exercises, from a military perspective, was the element of surprise embedded in the tactics and technology used. The Bavar-5 kamikaze drone, previously untested in such a high-profile setting, emerged as a game-changer.

Unlike traditional missiles, the Bavar-5’s ability to loiter, adjust its trajectory, and strike with precision introduced an unpredictable variable for enemy defenses. Its 400-kilometer range allows it to engage targets far from Iran’s shores, potentially bypassing layered defense systems on naval vessels.

The drone’s stealth characteristics, combined with its low-cost production, make it an ideal weapon for asymmetric warfare, capable of overwhelming expensive missile defense systems through sheer numbers or coordinated strikes.

For an adversary, the prospect of facing a swarm of such drones, alongside radar-evading cruise missiles, significantly complicates defensive planning.

The incorporation of electronic warfare units further amplifies the surprise factor. During these exercises, Iran demonstrated its ability to jam enemy radar and communication systems, creating a window of opportunity for its missiles and drones to penetrate defenses undetected.

This capability is particularly relevant in the context of modern naval warfare, where advanced radar systems like Aegis are designed to track and intercept incoming threats.

By disrupting these systems, Iran can degrade an adversary’s situational awareness, increasing the likelihood of a successful strike.

The use of EW in conjunction with stealthy missiles and drones suggests a sophisticated understanding of integrated warfare, where electronic and kinetic effects are combined to maximize impact.

From a broader strategic perspective, the exercises showcased the growing might of Iran’s defense industry. The fact that all systems used—missiles, drones, and supporting technologies—were domestically produced underscores the country's technological self-sufficiency.

This is a critical factor in a region where sanctions and embargoes make access to foreign arms difficult. By developing and deploying advanced weaponry, Iran has not only enhanced its deterrence but also positioned itself as a potential arms exporter, a move that could reshape regional alliances.

The successful testing of these systems in live-fire exercises also provides valuable data for further refinement, ensuring that Iran’s arsenal remains cutting-edge.

The psychological impact of these drills is equally significant. For domestic audiences, the exercise was a source of national pride, demonstrating Iran’s ability to innovate and defend its sovereignty despite external pressures. For adversaries, it was a stark reminder of Iran’s growing military capabilities and its willingness to employ them if necessary.

The synchronized destruction of a target using multiple weapon systems was not just a tactical achievement but a visual spectacle, designed to convey strength and resolve.

In the context of recent regional developments, this display of power serves to deter aggressors while reassuring allies of Iran’s reliability as a security partner.

I see these drills as a clear signal of Iran’s maturing defense capabilities and its readiness to confront threats with a combination of technological innovation and strategic audacity.

For any potential adversary, the message is clear: underestimating Iran’s naval and missile prowess would be a grave mistake.

Mohammad Molaei is a Tehran-based military affairs analyst.

(The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of Press TV)

Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:

www.presstv.co.uk